What’s the difference between barefoot and minimalist shoes? There is often confusion around what distinguishes the two. Many people recognise that there is a difference between traditional and non-traditional footwear however, when it comes to identifying a barefoot shoe from a minimalist shoe most people are often left a little baffled. We believe there’s a big difference between barefoot and minimalist shoes.
Minimalist Shoes = Heel Strike + Motion Control
Minimalist shoes take all the hallmarks of traditional running shoes; motion control, air, gel etcetera and make them less. The danger with minimalist shoes is they do all the things traditional trainers do: affect your posture, restrict the amount of sensory feedback (proprioception) and constrict natural foot movement.
- 8mm+ sole thickness
- Quite often minimalist shoe manufacturers give a heel elevation, between 4-8mm.
- Some cushioning, which compromises both proprioception and flexibility.
- Narrow toe box
Barefoot Shoes = Maximum Protection + Proprioception
I know what you are all thinking: barefoot shoes – there’s an oxymoron if I ever saw one. Our take on barefoot shoes: they allow your feet to be as close to barefoot as possible while being protected from different environmental elements. Keeping that in mind, let’s look at some of the characteristics of barefoot shoes:
- A puncture-resistant sole; less than 7mm thick.
- Absolutely no heel elevation, which means there is zero-drop from heel to toe.
- Nearly no cushioning so that the person wearing the shoes can get maximum sensory feedback from his/her feet. No cushioning also permits the sole to be flexible, which allows the joints in the foot to stretch and reach a full range of motion.
- An anatomic toe box giving the toes a chance to splay naturally.
A Sole for Every Terrain
There are many harsh terrains and climates around the world, which would make it impractical to go barefoot all the time so it’s important to allow the maximum sensory feedback (proprioception) that you get from being barefoot while protecting your feet from the environment. All VIVOBAREFOOT shoes feature the puncture-resistant sole that provides protection, but the sole construction differs based on the product. From an off road sole made with multi-directional lugs to maximize grip, to a ultra-thin indoor and on road long lasting sole, and even a fully moulded upper-outsole combination perfect for beach and waterside adventures, we have the largest and most complete suite of barefoot products on the market. Read more on our different barefoot soles.
Here at VIVOBAREFOOT we have a clear idea of the differences between barefoot and minimalist shoes. And we believe barefoot is best. But, what’s your opinion? Do you think there’s a difference?





Kyle Nichol
Personally I do not buy into the ‘barefoot shoes’ nomenclature. To me it’s minimalist shoes and transitional shoes (same features as your barefoot and minimalist shoes). There is definitely a difference between minimalist shoes, transitional shoes and being barefoot. It’s all about the running form and proprioception. That and having a anatomical last.
Comment by Kyle Nichol — February 16, 2012 @ 8:56 pm
Fred
I agree with Kyle Nichol. Minimalist shoes are what you call barefoot shoes (which is an oxymoron) and your minimalist shoes are transitional shoes which in my opinion are pointless. My definition is taken from
http://www.livingbarefoot.info/2011/10/the-6-key-features-of-a-minimalist-barefoot-shoe/
Minimalist shoe=
-max of 8mm flexible sole
-light weight under 500g per pair
-zero drop
-anatomical shape
-no support
-no shock absorption
-
Comment by Fred — February 28, 2012 @ 3:13 pm
Sean Smith
I also agree with the top two posters. I’ve been in the shoe business for 7 years and have seen every company try to twist the market to their perspective and make it more complicated in an attempt to confuse the consumer. If you can’t convince, confuse. Conventional: Big heels. Transitional: Smaller heels geared to consumers who don’t understand that products are secondary. Minimal: Zero drop. That is all.
Comment by Sean Smith — March 20, 2012 @ 7:04 am
Ken Florian
I concur with above three posts. “Barefoot” means nothing on the foot. Period. “Shoe” means something on the foot. Period. A few basic gradations within “shoe” seem permissable per Sean Smith’s post. After that, I want accurate descriptors…the remainder of the branding is up to the manufacturer.
When I can’t go barefoot I wear Vito minimalist shoes.
Ken Florian
Comment by Ken Florian — April 1, 2012 @ 3:20 pm
VIVOBAREFOOT | The original barefoot shoe | Barefoot Running | Barefoot Shoes | Community
[...] talked about Barefoot shoes and Minimal shoes before and we believe there’s a big difference between barefoot and minimalist [...]
Pingback by VIVOBAREFOOT | The original barefoot shoe | Barefoot Running | Barefoot Shoes | Community — April 16, 2012 @ 10:46 am
Cody R.
a bit late on this article, I understand that “barefoot shoe” is an oxymoron, however, i like to use that term simply because it helps someone understand what the shoe is like, or what it’s trying to allow you to do as much as possible
I actually use “minimal shoe” the least since it does seem to add a little bit of confusion
i use transitional since that”s basically what they are, even though i don’t like them all that much, mainly cause i’m barefoot already…
so yea, barefoot and transitional shoe toes for me
Comment by Cody R. — March 6, 2013 @ 6:21 pm